Summary

• Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
• Objects (1 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
  • Confluence.Code.ConfluencePageClass[0]

Details

Page properties

Author

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-XWiki.rvh
	1	+XWiki.cds

Content

...	...	@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
15	15
16	16	= Interaction With Your Adviser(s) =
17	17
18		-A good interaction with your adviser(s) is key to success. Unless you happen to have substantial work experience and to already be an expert in your field, your adviser is ahead of you in terms of experience and expertise. Take advantage of this to improve your own work.
	18	+A good interaction with your adviser(s) is key to success. Unless you happen to have substantial work experience and to be already an expert in your field, your adviser is ahead of you in terms of experience and expertise. Take advantage of this to improve your own work.
19	19
20	20	Advisers are humans. They like to help you with your thesis topic; they don't like to have to "drive" it, or to get the feeling that their advice (including the hints on this page) is ignored. You, and not your adviser, should be the one who is pushing your work, asking questions, initiating discussions, and handing over thesis/chapter drafts without having to be explicitly asked for it. In short, your adviser should be convinced that your work is on track.
21	21
...	...	@@ -33,13 +33,12 @@
33	33	** Soft requirements that can be solved if time permits
34	34	* Schedule outlining your proceeding (this includes writing the thesis, see next section)
35	35
36		-You should send your thesis proposal to your advisor and (if he is not already your advisor) the professor. After you finished the proposal, you should give a short (informal) talk of about 15 minutes during our daily tea meeting presenting your topic to all members of our group.
	36	+After you finished the proposal, you should give a short (informal) talk of about 15 minutes during our daily tea meeting presenting your topic to all members of our group.
37	37
38	38	= Timing is (Almost) Everything =
39	39
40	40	Chances are your adviser has already supervised one or more theses. Take advantage of his or her experience! Send him drafts of the chapters of your thesis before submitting the final thesis. Of course, the drafts should be as good as possible from your point of view. Your adviser can only improve your drafts so much. If your draft is of low quality, (s)he can help you push it to an okay-ish level; but if the draft is already of high-quality to start with, (s)he can help you elevate it to pure awesomeness. Note that your drafts need not be complete yet: you can always hand in missing bits and pieces later on. Here's a schedule that has proven to work well regarding when to hand in what.
41	41
42		-(% class="wrapped" %)
43	43	|=(((
44	44	What
45	45	)))|=(((
...	...	@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
93	93
94	94	The bottom line: write clean and proper code that adheres to our coding guidelines and document it. The quality and the readability of your code and of your documentation will influence your grade.
95	95
96		-== Reviews and Ratings ==
	95	+== Reviews and Ratings[[url:http://trac.rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/trac/rtsys/wiki/Hinweise_Arbeiten#ReviewsundRatings||style="text-decoration: none;" title="Link to this section" shape="rect" class="anchor"]] ==
97	97
98	98	To make sure that code is of a certain quality, it must be run through design and code reviews. The way this works is explained [[on this page>>doc:KIELER.Review Process]]. The reviews are not only intended to improve the quality of your code, but also to give feedback to you as a programmer to help you improve.
99	99
...	...	@@ -103,17 +103,16 @@
103	103
104	104	Zur Beurteilung einer Diplomarbeit wird generell ein schriftliches Gutachten erstellt, welches die jeweilige Arbeit individuell würdigt (incl. Note) und an das Prüfungsamt weitergeleitet wird. Es hängt dabei von der jeweiligen Aufgabenstellung ab, welche Leistungen im Einzelfall erwartet werden; so sind z.B. die Anforderungen hinsichtlich der konkreten Umsetzung bei einer stark anwendungsbezogenen Arbeit anders als bei einer eher theoretischen Arbeit. Gewisse Anforderungen und Erwartungen hinsichtlich der Qualität der Arbeit und der Vorgehensweise des Studierenden sind jedoch allgemein gültig, und z.T. auch bereits in der jeweiligen Prüfungsordnung konkret genannt. So sieht z.B. §19(1) der Diplomprüfungsordnung vor: „Die Diplomarbeit [...] soll zeigen, dass die Kandidatin oder der Kandidat in der Lage ist, innerhalb einer vorgegebenen Frist ein Problem aus dem Fach Informatik selbständig nach wissenschaftlichen Methoden zu bearbeiten.“ Hier sind also bereits drei Kriterien genannt (Fristeinhaltung, Selbständigkeit, Wissenschaftlichkeit). Ein etwas detaillierterer Kriterien-/Bewertungskatalog ist in den beiden folgenden Tabellen angegeben. Diese sind zunächst für Diplomarbeiten ausgelegt, finden aber - mit entsprechenden Abwandlungen - auch für Studien-, Bachelor- und Masterarbeiten Anwendung.
105	105
106		-(% class="wrapped" %)
107	107	|(((
108	108	**Merkmal**
109	109	)))|(((
110		-\\
	108	+
111	111	)))|(((
112		-\\
	110	+
113	113	)))|(((
114		-\\
	112	+
115	115	)))|(((
116		-\\
	114	+
117	117	)))|(((
118	118	**Punkte**
119	119	)))
...	...	@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
128	128	)))|(((
129	129	Vollständige, gute Lösung und Behandlung zusätzlicher Fragestellungen
130	130	)))|(((
131		-\\
	129	+
132	132	)))
133	133	|(((
134	134	Punkte
...	...	@@ -240,13 +240,13 @@
240	240	max. 16
241	241	)))
242	242	|(((
243		-\\
	241	+
244	244	)))|(((
245		-\\
	243	+
246	246	)))|(((
247		-\\
	245	+
248	248	)))|(((
249		-\\
	247	+
250	250	)))|(((
251	251	**Summe**
252	252	)))|(((
...	...	@@ -255,7 +255,6 @@
255	255
256	256	Die Umrechnung einer Punktzahl in eine Zensur ergibt sich unter Anwendung dieses Katalogs aus der folgenden Tabelle.
257	257
258		-(% class="wrapped" %)
259	259	|(((
260	260	Note
261	261	)))|(((
...	...	@@ -303,10 +303,6 @@
303	303	24
304	304	)))
305	305
306		-= RtSys Stammtisch =
307		-
308		-Every student who is going to write a thesis and hence is considered an integral part of our group is more than welcome to join our [[doc:RtSys Stammtisch]]. We will meet monthly in different restaurants in Kiel to have dinner and a good time together. Please ask your advisor or other students to invite you
309		-
310	310	= Further Links =
311	311
312	312	* Prof. Luttenberger at the [[Communication Systems Group>>url:http://www.comsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/||shape="rect"]] regularly offers a very good course on writing and presenting scientific work.

Confluence.Code.ConfluencePageClass[0]

Id

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-37814327
	1	+10751502

URL

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/RTSYS/pages/37814327/Writing and Grading Theses
	1	+https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/RTSYS/pages/10751502/Writing and Grading Theses