Changes for page 2018/19 Layout

Last modified by Soeren Domroes on 2025/01/30 11:56
<
From version < 8.1 >
edited by cds
on 2018/07/04 13:28
To version < 15.1 >
edited by cds
on 2018/07/17 15:51
>
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -49,29 +49,55 @@
49 49  Die Paperliste befindet sich aktuell noch im Aufbau, also verlasst euch besser noch nicht darauf.
50 50  {{/note}}
51 51  
52 -== Graph Layout ==
52 +== Aesthetics ==
53 53  
54 -Wybrow, Marriott, Stuckey. Orthogonal hyperedge routing. Diagrams 2012.
54 ++ Purchase, Freeman, Hamer. An exploration of visual complexity. Diagrams 2012.
55 55  
56 -Bottoni, Costagliola, Fish. Euler diagram encodings. Diagrams 2012.
56 ++ Lloyd, Rodgers, Roberts. Metro map colour-coding: effect on usability in route tracing. Diagrams 2018.
57 57  
58 -== Perception ==
58 ++ Kobourov, Pupyrev, Saket. Are crossings important for drawing large graphs? GD 2014.
59 59  
60 -Burns, Carberry, Elzer, and Chester. Automatically recognizing intended messages in grouped bar charts. Diagrams 2012.
60 +Ware, Purchase, Colpoys, McGill. Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Information visualization 2002.
61 61  
62 -Purchase, Freeman, Hamer. An exploration of visual complexity. Diagrams 2012.
62 +== Perception and Usage ==
63 63  
64 -Alqadah, Stapleton, Howse, Chapman. Evaluation the impact of clutter in Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2014.
64 ++ Burns, Carberry, Elzer, and Chester. Automatically recognizing intended messages in grouped bar charts. Diagrams 2012.
65 65  
66 -Chapman, Stapleton, Rodgers, Micallef, Blake. Visualizing sets: an empirical comparison of diagram types. Diagrams 2014.
66 ++ Petre. 'No Shit' or 'Oh Shit': Responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice. Software & Systems Modeling, 2014.
67 67  
68 -== Miscellaneous ==
68 +== Browsing ==
69 69  
70 -Durugbo. Modelling information flow: improving diagrammatic visualizations. Diagrams 2012.
70 ++ Nachmanson, Prutkin, Lee, Riche, Holroyd, Chen. GraphMaps: browsing large graphs as interactive maps. GD 2015.
71 71  
72 -Nagy. Graphical representations of context-free languages. Diagrams 2014.
72 ++ Vaaraniemi, Goerlich, in der Au. Intelligent prioritization and filtering of labels in navigation maps. Journal of WSCG, 2014.
73 73  
74 -Bojda, Bubnó, Nagy, Takács. A graphical representation of boolean logic. Diagrams 2014.
74 +== Graph Drawing ==
75 +
76 ++ Wybrow, Marriott, Stuckey. Orthogonal hyperedge routing. Diagrams 2012. (Ideal für Abschlussarbeit)
77 +
78 ++ Fink, Wolff, Schuhmann, Aulbach. Drawing graphs with restricted area. GD 2014.
79 +
80 +Athenstädt, Hartmann, Nöllenburg. Simultaneous embeddability of two partitions.
81 +
82 +Walshaw. A multilevel algorithm for force-directed graph drawing. GD 2000. (Master, weil mit >30 Seiten recht lang?)
83 +
84 ++ Chevalier, Safro. Comparison of coarsening schemes for multilevel graph partitioning. International Conference on Learning and Intelligent Optimization, 2009.
85 +
86 +== Euler Diagrams ==
87 +
88 ++ Bottoni, Costagliola, Fish. Euler diagram encodings. Diagrams 2012.
89 +
90 ++ Baimagambetov, Howse, Stapleton, Delaney. Generating effective Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2018.
91 +
92 +Mutton, Rodgers, Flower. Drawing graphs in Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2004. (hatten wir glaube ich schon mal)
93 +
94 ++ Chapman, Stapleton, Rodgers, Micallef, Blake. Visualizing sets: an empirical comparison of diagram types. Diagrams 2014.
95 +
96 +== Other Types of Diagrams ==
97 +
98 +Grossman, Harel. On the algorithmics of Higraphs. 1997.
99 +
100 ++ Erwig, Smeltzer. Variational pictures. Diagrams 2018.
75 75  {{/expand}}
76 76  
77 77  = Ablauf =
... ... @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
256 256  Ausarbeitung
257 257  )))|(((
258 258  {{code language="none"}}
259 -<login>/sem16ws-<login>.[tex/pdf]
285 +<login>/sem18ws-<login>.[tex/pdf]
260 260  {{/code}}
261 261  )))
262 262  |=(((
... ... @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@
263 263  Vortragsfolien
264 264  )))|(((
265 265  {{code language="none"}}
266 -<login>/sem16ws-<login>-talk.[tex/pdf]
292 +<login>/sem18ws-<login>-talk.[tex/pdf]
267 267  {{/code}}
268 268  )))
269 269  |=(((
... ... @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
270 270  Handoutfolien
271 271  )))|(((
272 272  {{code language="none"}}
273 -<login>/sem16ss-<login>-handout.[tex/pdf]
299 +<login>/sem18ws-<login>-handout.[tex/pdf]
274 274  {{/code}}
275 275  )))
276 276  |=(((
... ... @@ -277,10 +277,10 @@
277 277  Review
278 278  )))|(((
279 279  Generelle Anmerkungen:
280 -{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem16ss-<login review-Empfänger>-reviewnotes-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
306 +{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem18ws-<login review-Empfänger>-reviewnotes-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
281 281  
282 282  Annotiertes PDF:
283 -{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem16ws-<login review-Empfänger>-review-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
309 +{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem18ws-<login review-Empfänger>-review-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
284 284  )))
285 285  
286 286  Die Handoutfolien unterscheiden sich von den Vortragsfolien dadurch, dass die Handoutfolien keine Animationen für die Präsentation am Beamer enthalten. Beim Arbeiten mit der LaTeX-beamer Klasse können Handoutfolien durch das Hinzufügen eines optionalen Argumentes bei der Deklaration der Dokumentenklasse generiert werden ({{code language="none"}}\documentclass[trans]{beamer}{{/code}}).
Confluence.Code.ConfluencePageClass[0]
Id
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -45318178
1 +45318259
URL
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/SEM/pages/45318178/WS18/19 (Layout)
1 +https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/SEM/pages/45318259/WS18/19 (Layout)

Navigation

Quick Links

KIELER on GitHub
RTSYS Homepage