<
From version < 14.1 >
edited by cds
on 2018/07/17 15:48
To version < 11.1 >
edited by cds
on 2018/07/04 14:42
>
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -49,55 +49,43 @@
49 49  Die Paperliste befindet sich aktuell noch im Aufbau, also verlasst euch besser noch nicht darauf.
50 50  {{/note}}
51 51  
52 -== Aesthetics ==
52 +Wybrow, Marriott, Stuckey. Orthogonal hyperedge routing. Diagrams 2012.
53 53  
54 -+ Purchase, Freeman, Hamer. An exploration of visual complexity. Diagrams 2012.
54 +Bottoni, Costagliola, Fish. Euler diagram encodings. Diagrams 2012.
55 55  
56 -+ Lloyd, Rodgers, Roberts. Metro map colour-coding: effect on usability in route tracing. Diagrams 2018.
56 +Baimagambetov, Howse, Stapleton, Delaney. Generating effective Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2018.
57 57  
58 -+ Kobourov, Pupyrev, Saket. Are crossings important for drawing large graphs? GD 2014.
58 +Erwig, Smeltzer. Variational pictures. Diagrams 2018.
59 59  
60 -Ware, Purchase, Colpoys, McGill. Cognitive measurements of graph aesthetics. Information visualization 2002.
60 +Burns, Carberry, Elzer, and Chester. Automatically recognizing intended messages in grouped bar charts. Diagrams 2012.
61 61  
62 -== Perception and Usage ==
62 +Purchase, Freeman, Hamer. An exploration of visual complexity. Diagrams 2012.
63 63  
64 -+ Burns, Carberry, Elzer, and Chester. Automatically recognizing intended messages in grouped bar charts. Diagrams 2012.
64 +Alqadah, Stapleton, Howse, Chapman. Evaluation the impact of clutter in Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2014.
65 65  
66 -Petre. 'No Shit' or 'Oh Shit': Responses to observations on the use of UML in professional practice. Software & Systems Modeling, 2014.
66 +Chapman, Stapleton, Rodgers, Micallef, Blake. Visualizing sets: an empirical comparison of diagram types. Diagrams 2014.
67 67  
68 -== Browsing ==
68 +Fox, de Vries, Lima, Loker. Exploring representations of student time-use. Diagrams 2016.
69 69  
70 -+ Nachmanson, Prutkin, Lee, Riche, Holroyd, Chen. GraphMaps: browsing large graphs as interactive maps. GD 2015.
70 +Kriglstein, Haider, Wallner, Pohl. Who, where, when and with whom? Evaluation of group meeting visualization. Diagrams 2016.
71 71  
72 -+ Vaaraniemi, Goerlich, in der Au. Intelligent prioritization and filtering of labels in navigation maps. Journal of WSCG, 2014.
72 +Tversky, Gao, Corter, Tanaka, Nickerson. People, place, and time: inferences from diagrams. Diagrams 2016.
73 73  
74 -== Graph Drawing ==
74 +Lloyd, Rodgers, Roberts. Matro map colour-coding: effect on usability in route tracing. Diagrams 2018.
75 75  
76 -+ Wybrow, Marriott, Stuckey. Orthogonal hyperedge routing. Diagrams 2012. (Ideal für Abschlussarbeit)
76 +Durugbo. Modelling information flow: improving diagrammatic visualizations. Diagrams 2012.
77 77  
78 -+ Fink, Wolff, Schuhmann, Aulbach. Drawing graphs with restricted area. GD 2014.
78 +Nagy. Graphical representations of context-free languages. Diagrams 2014.
79 79  
80 -Athenstädt, Hartmann, Nöllenburg. Simultaneous embeddability of two partitions.
80 +Bojda, Bubnó, Nagy, Takács. A graphical representation of boolean logic. Diagrams 2014.
81 81  
82 -Walshaw. A multilevel algorithm for force-directed graph drawing. GD 2000.
82 +Kobourov, Pupyrev, Saket. Are crossings important for drawing large graphs? GD 2014.
83 83  
84 -Chevalier, Safro. Comparison of coarsening schemes for multilevel graph partitioning. International Conference on Learning and Intelligent Optimization, 2009.
84 +Fink, Wolff, Schuhmann, Aulbach. Drawing graphs with restricted area. GD 2014.
85 85  
86 -== Euler Diagrams ==
86 +Nachmanson, Prutkin, Lee, Riche, Holroyd, Chen. GraphMaps: browsing large graphs as interactive maps. GD 2015.
87 87  
88 -+ Bottoni, Costagliola, Fish. Euler diagram encodings. Diagrams 2012.
89 -
90 -+ Baimagambetov, Howse, Stapleton, Delaney. Generating effective Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2018.
91 -
92 -Mutton, Rodgers, Flower. Drawing graphs in Euler diagrams. Diagrams 2004.
93 -
94 -+ Chapman, Stapleton, Rodgers, Micallef, Blake. Visualizing sets: an empirical comparison of diagram types. Diagrams 2014.
95 -
96 -== Other Types of Diagrams ==
97 -
98 -Grossman, Harel. On the algorithmics of Higraphs. 1997.
99 -
100 -+ Erwig, Smeltzer. Variational pictures. Diagrams 2018.
88 +Hou, Chapman, Oliver. Measuring perceived clutter in concept diagrams. VL/HCC 2016.
101 101  {{/expand}}
102 102  
103 103  = Ablauf =
... ... @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@
282 282  Ausarbeitung
283 283  )))|(((
284 284  {{code language="none"}}
285 -<login>/sem18ws-<login>.[tex/pdf]
273 +<login>/sem16ws-<login>.[tex/pdf]
286 286  {{/code}}
287 287  )))
288 288  |=(((
... ... @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@
289 289  Vortragsfolien
290 290  )))|(((
291 291  {{code language="none"}}
292 -<login>/sem18ws-<login>-talk.[tex/pdf]
280 +<login>/sem16ws-<login>-talk.[tex/pdf]
293 293  {{/code}}
294 294  )))
295 295  |=(((
... ... @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@
296 296  Handoutfolien
297 297  )))|(((
298 298  {{code language="none"}}
299 -<login>/sem18ws-<login>-handout.[tex/pdf]
287 +<login>/sem16ss-<login>-handout.[tex/pdf]
300 300  {{/code}}
301 301  )))
302 302  |=(((
... ... @@ -303,10 +303,10 @@
303 303  Review
304 304  )))|(((
305 305  Generelle Anmerkungen:
306 -{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem18ws-<login review-Empfänger>-reviewnotes-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
294 +{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem16ss-<login review-Empfänger>-reviewnotes-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
307 307  
308 308  Annotiertes PDF:
309 -{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem18ws-<login review-Empfänger>-review-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
297 +{{code language="none"}}<login review-Empfänger>/sem16ws-<login review-Empfänger>-review-<login Reviewer>.[pdf]{{/code}}
310 310  )))
311 311  
312 312  Die Handoutfolien unterscheiden sich von den Vortragsfolien dadurch, dass die Handoutfolien keine Animationen für die Präsentation am Beamer enthalten. Beim Arbeiten mit der LaTeX-beamer Klasse können Handoutfolien durch das Hinzufügen eines optionalen Argumentes bei der Deklaration der Dokumentenklasse generiert werden ({{code language="none"}}\documentclass[trans]{beamer}{{/code}}).
Confluence.Code.ConfluencePageClass[0]
Id
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -45318241
1 +45318236
URL
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/SEM/pages/45318241/WS18/19 (Layout)
1 +https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/SEM/pages/45318236/WS18/19 (Layout)