Changes for page 2024 Synchronous Languages
Last modified by Maximilian Kasperowski on 2025/01/30 12:01
<
>
edited by Jette Petzold
on 2024/01/19 08:15
on 2024/01/19 08:15
edited by Alexander Schulz-Rosengarten
on 2024/02/19 15:31
on 2024/02/19 15:31
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. jep1 +XWiki.als - Content
-
... ... @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ 7 7 (% style="text-align: left;" %) 8 8 == Prerequisites == 9 9 10 -This seminar is buil dupon the contents of the "Synchronous Languages" lecture. All participants that did not yet attend this lecture are recommended to read the following introduction paper, at least parts I and II:10 +This seminar is built upon the contents of the "Synchronous Languages" lecture. All participants that did not yet attend this lecture are recommended to read the following introduction paper, at least parts I and II: 11 11 12 12 Benveniste, A.; Caspi, P.; Edwards, S.A.; Halbwachs, N.; Le Guernic, P.; de Simone, R., "The synchronous languages 12 years later," //Proceedings of the IEEE// , vol.91, no.1, pp.64,83, Jan 2003 ([[pdf>>url:http://www.cs.columbia.edu/%7Esedwards/papers/benveniste2003synchronous.pdf||shape="rect" class="MIME-application MIME--pdf external-link"]]). 13 13 ... ... @@ -56,32 +56,25 @@ 56 56 (% style="color:#333333" %)L. Grimm, S. Smyth, A. Schulz-Rosengarten, R. von Hanxleden and M. Pouzet, [[From Lustre to Graphical Models and SCCharts>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9232944||shape="rect"]], //2020 Forum for Specification and Design Languages (FDL)//, 2020, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/FDL50818.2020.9232944. 57 57 58 58 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 59 - ====**Real-Time /Embedded**====59 +M. C. Werner and K. Schneider, "[[From IEC 61131-3 Function Block Diagrams to Sequentially Constructive Statecharts>>https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9925656]]," //2022 Forum on Specification & Design Languages (FDL)//, Linz, Austria, 2022, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/FDL56239.2022.9925656. 60 60 61 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 62 -Saranya Natarajan and David Broman, [[Temporal Property-Based Testing of a Timed C Compiler using Time-Flow Graph Semantics>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9232935||shape="rect"]], //2020 Forum for Specification and Design Languages (FDL)//(% style="color:#333333" %), 2020 63 63 64 64 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 65 - FranciscoSant'Anna, Rodrigo Santos, and Noemi Rodriguez. 2021. [[Symmetric distributed applications>>url:https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3486605.3486786||shape="rect"]].//Proceedingsof the 8th ACMSIGPLAN InternationalWorkshop on Reactive and Event-Based Languagesand Systems//. Association for Computing Machinery.63 +==== **Safety Analysis / Model Checking** ==== 66 66 67 67 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 68 -= ===**Safety Analysis**====66 +(% style="color:#333333" %)J. Axelsson and A. Kobetski, [[Towards a risk analysis method for systems-of-systems based on systems thinking>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8369501||shape="rect"]]. //2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)//, 2018, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369501. 69 69 70 70 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 71 -(% style="color:# 222222" %)SvenStefanKrauss, MartinRejzek,andChristianHilbes.[[ToolQualificationConsiderationsforToolsSupporting STPA>>url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705815038606||shape="rect"]].(%style="text-align:left"%)//ProcediaEngineering//(%style="color:#222222"%)128(2015): 15-24.69 +(% style="color:#333333" %)F. G. R. de Souza, J. de Melo Bezerra, C. M. Hirata, P. de Saqui-Sannes and L. Apvrille, [[Combining STPA with SysML Modeling>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9275867||shape="rect"]]. //2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)//, 2020, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275867. 72 72 73 73 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 74 - (%style="color:#333333" %)H. Reza,M.Pimple,V.Krishnaand J.Hildle,[[ASafetyAnalysisMethodUsingFaultTreeAnalysisand Petri Nets>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5070769||shape="rect"]].(% style="color:#222222" %)//2009Sixth International Conference onInformationTechnology:New Generations//(%style="color:#333333" %),2009,pp.1089-1094,doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.183.72 +J. Kloos, T. Hussain, and R. Eschbach. [[Risk-based testing of safety-critical embedded systems driven by fault tree analysis>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=5954386]]. In //2011 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops//, pp. 26-33. IEEE, 2011. 75 75 76 76 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 77 - (%style="color:#333333"%)J.AxelssonandA.Kobetski, [[Towardsa risk analysis methodforsystems-of-systemsbasedonsystemsthinking>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8369501||shape="rect"]].2018 AnnualIEEEInternationalSystemsConference(SysCon)//,2018, pp.1-8, doi:10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369501.75 +L. A. Cortes, P. Eles and Z. Peng, [[Formal coverification of embedded systems using model checking>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=874622&tag=1]]. //Proceedings of the 26th Euromicro Conference. EUROMICRO 2000. Informatics: Inventing the Future//. Vol. 1. IEEE, 2000. 78 78 79 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 80 -(% style="color:#333333" %)F. G. R. de Souza, J. de Melo Bezerra, C. M. Hirata, P. de Saqui-Sannes and L. Apvrille, [[Combining STPA with SysML Modeling>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9275867||shape="rect"]]. //2020 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon)//, 2020, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/SysCon47679.2020.9275867. 81 81 82 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 83 -(% style="color:#333333" %)D. L. Gurgel, C. M. Hirata and J. De M. Bezerra, [[A rule-based approach for safety analysis using STAMP/STPA>>url:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7311464||shape="rect"]]. //2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)//, 2015, pp. 7B2-1-7B2-8, doi: 10.1109/DASC.2015.7311464. 84 - 85 85 === Master Recommendations === 86 86 87 87 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) ... ... @@ -100,27 +100,13 @@ 100 100 (% style="color:#003366" %)Evgeny Kusmenko, Bernhard Rumpe, Sascha Schneiders, and Michael von Wenckstern. 2018. [[Highly-Optimizing and Multi-Target Compiler for Embedded System Models: C++ Compiler Toolchain for the Component and Connector Language EmbeddedMontiArc>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3239388||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 21th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems// (MODELS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 447-457. 101 101 102 102 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 103 - ====**Real-Time/Embedded**====96 +Kenwright, L., Roop, P.S., Allen, N., Lall, S., Cascaval, C., Spalink, T., & Izzard, M. (2024). [[Logical Synchrony Networks: A formal model for deterministic distribution>>https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07433]]. //ArXiv, abs/2402.07433//. 104 104 105 105 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 106 - (% style="color:#003366"%)J(%%)ordanA.Ross,AlexandrMurashkin,JiaHuiLiang,Micha(% class="authors__name"%)łAntkiewicz, Krzysztof Czarnecki,[[Synthesisandexploration ofmulti-level,multi-perspectivearchitectures ofautomotiveembedded systems>>url:https://rdcu.be/bQRqq||shape="rect"]],(%style="color:#003366"%)Software&SystemsModeling201999 +Fabien Siron, Dumitru Potop-Butucaru, Robert De Simone, Damien Chabrol, and Amira Methni. 2023.[[ Semantics foundations of PsyC based on synchronous Logical Execution Time>>https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576914.3587495]]. In Proceedings of Cyber-Physical Systems and Internet of Things Week 2023 (CPS-IoT Week '23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 319–324. https:~/~/doi.org/10.1145/3576914.3587495 107 107 108 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 109 -(% style="color:#003366" %)Reza Ahmadi, Ernesto Posse, and Juergen Dingel. 2018.[[ Slicing UML-based Models of Real-time Embedded Systems>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3239372.3239407||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 21th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems// (MODELS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 346-356. 110 110 111 111 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 112 -(% style="color:#003366" %)Bader Alahmad and Sathish Gopalakrishnan. 2018. [[On Budgeting and Quality, with an Application to Safety-Critical Real-time Systems>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3273905.3273917||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems// (RTNS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19-29. 113 - 114 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 115 -(% style="color:#003366" %)Tobias Klaus, Florian Franzmann, Matthias Becker, and Peter Ulbrich. 2018. [[Data Propagation Delay Constraints in Multi-Rate Systems: Deadlines vs. Job-Level Dependencies>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3273905.3273923||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems// (RTNS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 93-103. 116 - 117 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 118 -(% style="color:#003366" %)Andreas Sailer, Michael Deubzer, Gerald Lüttgen, and Jürgen Mottok. 2017. [[Comparing trace recordings of automotive real-time software>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3139258.3139265||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems// (RTNS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 118-127. 119 - 120 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 121 -(% style="color:#003366" %)Guillaume Brau, Nicolas Navet, and Jérôme Hugues. 2017. [[Heterogeneous models and analyses in the design of real-time embedded systems - an avionic case-study>>url:https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3139258.3139281||shape="rect"]]. In //Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Real-Time Networks and Systems// (RTNS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 168-177. 122 - 123 -(% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) 124 124 ==== **Safety Analysis / Testing** ==== 125 125 126 126 (% style="margin-left: 30.0px;" %) ... ... @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ 140 140 Milestone 141 141 ))) 142 142 |((( 143 - tbd122 +Tue. 16.04 10:00 CAP4 R.1115 144 144 )))|((( 145 145 First Meeting/**Kick-Off **with a Latex and EasyChair introduction. 146 146 ))) ... ... @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ 219 219 220 220 === Talk === 221 221 222 -The talk should be 40 minutes (master) or 25minutes (bachelor) long. This is followed by 5 minutes of questions. The slides should contain page numbers to allow the participants to ask specific questions after the talk. It would be great to include a short tool demo if your topic includes some concrete implementation.201 +The talk should be 30 minutes (master) or 20 minutes (bachelor) long. This is followed by 5 minutes of questions. The slides should contain page numbers to allow the participants to ask specific questions after the talk. It would be great to include a short tool demo if your topic includes some concrete implementation. 223 223 224 224 You can freely choose your presentation tool. Therefore, for the individual dates on the presentation slides it would be best to to use your own computer. If the slides are provided as PDF beforehand, a different computer could be used. 225 225