<
From version < 11.1 >
edited by Alexander Schulz-Rosengarten
on 2014/01/10 11:28
To version < 10.1 >
edited by Alexander Schulz-Rosengarten
on 2014/01/03 17:00
>
Change comment: added example for Mapping and TransformationTree creation

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -26,9 +26,9 @@
26 26  
27 27  The structure of the model can be separated into two parts.
28 28  
29 -**First part** (upper half) is a tree of transformations. Each ModelWrapper-class is a representation of a model which is transformed. So ModelWrapper are nodes and ModelTransformations are edges. Thus the ModelWrapper representing the initial-source-model of all transformation is also the root of a TransformationTree-model.
29 +**First part** (upper half) is a tree of transformations. Each Model-class is a representation of a concrete model which is transformed. So models are nodes and ModelTransformations are edges. Thus the Model representing the root-model of a tree is also the root of a concrete TransformationTree-model.
30 30  
31 -**Second part** (lower half) is object-mapping. Instances of models contain EObjects as their elements, which are represented by EObjectWrapper-class in this metamodel. The EObjectWrapper of two models are connected with EObjectTransformations-class to express their origination relationship in corresponding model transformation.
31 +**Second part** (lower half) is object-mapping. Instances of models contain EObjects as their elements, which are represented by Element-class in TransformationTree metamodel. The Elements of two models are connected with ElementTransformations-class to model their origination relationship in corresponding model transformation.
32 32  
33 33  
34 34  
... ... @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
62 62  
63 63  == Implementation Details ==
64 64  
65 -* All references to EObjects in EObjectWrapper are references to a copy of the original EObject. This allows to represent immutable mapping. To reidentify corresponding EObjects TransformationTreeExtensions provides search functions which will check for structural matching models.
66 -* Models in TransformationTrees may be transient. This indicates that all references to EObjects in all Elements of the transient model are removed. Thus these models can't be source of a new appended transformation and can not be associated with it's original model. The main propose of this feature is to improve scalability of TransformationTrees by removing unnecessary references to internal model, but preserve traversing functionality of the object-mapping.
65 +* All references to EObjects are references to a copy of the original EObject. This allows to represent immutable mapping. To reidentify corresponding EObjects TransformationTreeExtensions provides search functions which will check for structural matching models.
66 +* Models in TransformationTrees may be transient. This indicates that all references to EObjects in all Elements of the transient model are removed. Thus these models can't be source of a new appended transformation and can not be associated with it's original model. The main propose of this feature is to improve scalability of TransformationTrees by removing unnecessary references to internal model, but preserve traversing functionality of the ObjectMapping.
67 67  * Mappings can be incomplete causing resulting transfromation tree to be incomplete. A incomplete tree does not represent every object in a model with a corresponding Element. This may break some paths of element transformations, but allows to omit model-immanent objects like annotations from mapping. TranformationMapping extension provies a function to check completeness of mapping against its models.
68 68  
69 69  ----
... ... @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
76 76  
77 77  {{code title="Modified SCChart Transformation" theme="Eclipse" linenumbers="true" language="java" firstline="1" collapse="true"}}
78 78  package de.cau.cs.kieler.ktm.test.transformations
79 +
79 79  import com.google.inject.Inject
80 80  import de.cau.cs.kieler.ktm.extensions.TransformationMapping
81 81  import de.cau.cs.kieler.sccharts.Region
... ... @@ -89,10 +89,12 @@
89 89   extension TransformationMapping
90 90   @Inject
91 91   extension SCChartsExtension
92 - // NEW - Mapping access delegation
93 +
94 + // -- Mapping Access
93 93   def extractMapping() {
94 94   extractMappingData;
95 95   }
98 +
96 96   //-------------------------------------------------------------------------
97 97   //-- S P L I T T R A N S I T I O N --
98 98   //-------------------------------------------------------------------------
... ... @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@
103 103   // Set the T_eff to have T's target state. Set T to have the target C.
104 104   // Add T_eff to C's outgoing transitions.
105 105   def Region transformTriggerEffect(Region rootRegion) {
106 - clearMapping; //NEW - clear previous mapping information to assure a single consistent mapping
107 107   // Clone the complete SCCharts region
108 108   var targetRootRegion = rootRegion.mappedCopy; //NEW - mapping information (changed copy to mappedCopy)
109 109   // Traverse all transitions
... ... @@ -110,18 +110,11 @@
110 110   for (targetTransition : targetRootRegion.getAllContainedTransitions) {
111 111   targetTransition.transformTriggerEffect(targetRootRegion);
112 112   }
113 - //check if mapping is complete (only for test proposes)
114 - val diff = rootRegion.checkMappingCompleteness(targetRootRegion);
115 - if (diff.key.empty && diff.value.empty) {
116 - targetRootRegion;
117 - } else {
118 - null
119 - }
115 + targetRootRegion;
120 120   }
121 121   def void transformTriggerEffect(Transition transition, Region targetRootRegion) {
122 122   // Only apply this to transition that have both, a trigger and one or more effects
123 - if (((transition.trigger != null || !transition.immediate) && !transition.effects.nullOrEmpty) ||
124 - transition.effects.size > 1) {
119 + if (((transition.trigger != null || !transition.immediate) && !transition.effects.nullOrEmpty) || transition.effects.size > 1) {
125 125   val targetState = transition.targetState
126 126   val parentRegion = targetState.parentRegion
127 127   val transitionOriginalTarget = transition.targetState
... ... @@ -156,13 +156,13 @@
156 156  Model aboSplitTEModel = transformationTreeExtensions.initializeTransformationTree(
157 157   transformation.extractMapping(),
158 158   "splitTriggerEffect",
159 - abo, "coreSCChart",
160 - aboSplitTE, "coreSCChart-splitTriggerEffect");
154 + abo, "ABO",
155 + aboSplitTE, "ABO-splitTriEff");
161 161  
162 162  tranformationTree = transformationTreeExtensions.root(aboSplitTEModel);
163 163  {{/code}}
164 164  
165 -The result of transformation is the following SCChart. ABO-splitTriggerEffect.
160 +The result of transformation is the following SCChart. ABO-splitTriEff.
166 166  
167 167  [[image:attach:example_abo_splitTE.jpeg]]
168 168  
... ... @@ -175,5 +175,3 @@
175 175  [[image:attach:example_tree_transformation.jpeg]]
176 176  
177 177  Here you can see the effect of the transformation causing the transformation to split up.
178 -
179 -[[image:attach:als-ktm-splitTriggerEffect-detail.jpg]]
Confluence.Code.ConfluencePageClass[0]
Id
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -8651594
1 +8651563
URL
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/KIELER/pages/8651594/Transformation Mapping (KTM)
1 +https://rtsys.informatik.uni-kiel.de/confluence//wiki/spaces/KIELER/pages/8651563/Transformation Mapping (KTM)