Comparison of the graphical representation
The following table depicts a detailed comparison of the graphical representation between the KIELER SyncCharts Editor and the Yakindu SCT Editor.
| KIELER | YAKINDU |
|
---|---|---|---|
Transition | YAKINDU: There is only one type for transitions KIELER: Strong Abort, Week Abort, Normal Termination | ||
State |
| ||
Composite State |
| ||
Initial State | YAKINDU: Initials State are pseudo states. The Initial State may not be a Composite State. An initial state can only have one outgoing transition and no incoming. KIELER: Initial states are supposed to have a thicker border than normal states | ||
Final State | YAKINDU: Final States are pseudo states. The Final State may not be a Composite State KIELER: Final states are depicted with a double border | ||
History | YAKINDU:
KIELER: A History is a attribute of a Transition | ||
Synchronization |
| YAKINDU: Synchronization is a pseudo state. KIELER: Synchronization not needed in KIELER
| |
Choice |
|
| KIELER | YAKINDU |
---|---|---|
Interface declaration |